- When I remember correctly, you said Attractor has been designed to make profit if movements are lower, it seems that it goes on cost in cases if movements are bigger. What do you think? do you plan any changes?
Hi,
thank you for your questions,
No, is not this what is happening.
Attractor can launch some trades in levels of movements that Price Action don't do it. This part is this way.
But after a trade has opened, a big movement is not the problem. The problem, as always, are the reversals. If you see the EURUSD first impulse, was a perfect setup, and almost all the different systems and timframes were fired. But the big reversal put in big losses at first moment. At same time, some contrary trades were opened and finally the situation were controled. But this reversal has not going much far, and at final, the result has been a little profit.
If you see the movement, has been more favourable in pairs like EURUAD and EURJPY, with bigger distance, while in EURUSD the situation always ends in the same way last months, with very low range movement.
But during the openend orders period, the manage of Price Action and Attractor is quite different. While Price Action tends to close the position earlier, Attractor search for more long develpment of the movement. And it's true that seeing the movements of Attractor since the start, a lot of times the EA has been in huge floating profits and ended with minor profits, but I checked the EA this weekend, and all says that the current parameters are the profitable at mid term, so for the moment I will give to the EA more time to see what happens, and is making profit at final, so is not too bad.
And I also like the very different way to manage the opened orders between Price Action and Attractor, because then, is a way of diversify for users that launches both.